{"id":16307,"date":"2019-09-12T13:10:02","date_gmt":"2019-09-12T21:10:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/2019\/09\/12\/news-10049\/"},"modified":"2019-09-12T13:10:02","modified_gmt":"2019-09-12T21:10:02","slug":"news-10049","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/2019\/09\/12\/news-10049\/","title":{"rendered":"YouTube ordered to cough up $170M settlement over COPPA infraction"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Credit to Author: Jovi Umawing| Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 20:15:22 +0000<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Last week, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced that it has required Google and YouTube to pay a settlement fee totaling $170 million after its video-sharing platform was found violating the <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\" (opens in a new tab)\" href=\"https:\/\/www.ftc.gov\/enforcement\/rules\/rulemaking-regulatory-reform-proceedings\/childrens-online-privacy-protection-rule\" target=\"_blank\">Children\u2019s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA)<\/a>. The complaint was filed by the FTC and the New York Attorney General, with the former set to receive the penalty amounting to $136 million and the latter $34 million.<\/p>\n<p>According to the FTC&#8217;s <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\" (opens in a new tab)\" href=\"https:\/\/www.ftc.gov\/news-events\/press-releases\/2019\/09\/google-youtube-will-pay-record-170-million-alleged-violations\" target=\"_blank\">press release<\/a>, this penalty &#8220;is by far the largest amount the FTC has ever obtained in a COPPA case since Congress enacted the law in 1998.&#8221;<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter\"><img decoding=\"async\" data-attachment-id=\"40373\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/privacy-2\/2019\/09\/youtube-170m-settlement-over-coppa-infraction\/attachment\/major_privacy_judgements_against_google\/\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/major_privacy_judgements_against_google.png\" data-orig-size=\"2500,1250\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"major_privacy_judgements_against_google\" data-image-description=\"\" data-medium-file=\"https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/major_privacy_judgements_against_google-300x150.png\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/major_privacy_judgements_against_google-600x300.png\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/major_privacy_judgements_against_google-600x300.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-40373\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/major_privacy_judgements_against_google-600x300.png 600w, https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/major_privacy_judgements_against_google-300x150.png 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><figcaption>Comparison of privacy cases won against Google (Courtesy: The FTC) <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>Note that the complaint doesn\u2019t involve the YouTube Kids app, a YouTube service dedicated to showcasing child-directed content only. <a href=\"https:\/\/support.google.com\/youtubekids\/answer\/6130541?hl=en\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\" (opens in a new tab)\">Although the app still displays ads<\/a>, albeit to a limited degree, it doesn\u2019t track child data for this purpose.<\/p>\n<p>This win over Google and YouTube follows on the heels of several complaints filed by the FTC in 2019 aiming to protect children&#8217;s privacy online. In May, <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\" (opens in a new tab)\" href=\"https:\/\/www.ftc.gov\/news-events\/press-releases\/2019\/05\/app-stores-remove-three-dating-apps-after-ftc-warns-operator\" target=\"_blank\">three dating apps were removed from both the Apple and Google market places<\/a> after the FTC alleged that the apps allowed 12-year-old kids to access them.<\/p>\n<p>i-Dressup.com, a dress-up game website, <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\"agreed to settle charges (opens in a new tab)\" href=\"https:\/\/www.ftc.gov\/news-events\/press-releases\/2019\/04\/ftc-alleges-operators-two-commercial-websites-failed-protect\" target=\"_blank\">agreed to settle charges<\/a> in April after the FTC filed a complaint, alleging that the operators of the website failed to ask for parental consent when collecting data from children under 13.<\/p>\n<p>In a similar case in February, the FTC <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\"reached a settlement with Musical.ly (opens in a new tab)\" href=\"https:\/\/www.ftc.gov\/news-events\/press-releases\/2019\/02\/video-social-networking-app-musically-agrees-settle-ftc\" target=\"_blank\">reached a settlement with Musical.ly<\/a>, now popularly known as TikTok, after its operators were found to collect data of young children, which includes their full names, email addresses, and other <a href=\"https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/glossary\/pii\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\" (opens in a new tab)\">personally identifiable information (PII)<\/a> without their parents\u2019 consent.<\/p>\n<h3>A summary of YouTube\u2019s violation<\/h3>\n<p>Since its inception, YouTube has touted itself as a video-sharing platform for general audience content. It was created for adults and not intended for children under 13 years of age.<\/p>\n<p>Through the years, however, YouTube has become a constant companion of young children. In fact, according to market research company, Smarty Pants, YouTube is recognized as <em>the<\/em> most beloved brand among US kids aged 6\u201312 years old for four straight years since 2016. [<a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\" (opens in a new tab)\" href=\"https:\/\/www.prnewswire.com\/news-releases\/youtube-now-the-1-brand-among-us-kids-6-12-300317418.html\" target=\"_blank\">1<\/a>][<a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\" (opens in a new tab)\" href=\"https:\/\/www.prnewswire.com\/news-releases\/smarty-pants-report-finds-youtube-is-kids-most-loved-brand-300502382.html\" target=\"_blank\">2<\/a>][<a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\" (opens in a new tab)\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/asksmartypants\/status\/1012436085861994497?lang=en\" target=\"_blank\">3<\/a>][<a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\" (opens in a new tab)\" href=\"https:\/\/www.prnewswire.com\/news-releases\/smarty-pants-study-finds-youtube-is-1-brand-among-us-kids-300894505.html\" target=\"_blank\">4<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s also exceedingly difficult to defend the argument that &#8220;YouTube is not for children&#8221; when a sizable amount of child-directed content is already present\u2014and continues to grow and rake in billions of views\u2014on the platform.<\/p>\n<p>YouTube&#8217;s business model is dependent on collecting personal information and persistent identifiers (i.e., <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\" (opens in a new tab)\" href=\"https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/101\/2018\/01\/cookies-should-i-worry-about-them\/\" target=\"_blank\">cookies<\/a>) from users for behavioral or personalized advertising. Child-directed channel owners who chose to monetize their content allowed YouTube to collect data of their target audience: children under 13, the age group YouTube said it wasn&#8217;t built for.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s easy to assume that YouTube may not have the means to know which data belongs to which age group, else they would have acted on it. However, <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\" (opens in a new tab)\" href=\"https:\/\/www.ftc.gov\/system\/files\/documents\/cases\/youtube_complaint.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">according to the complaint<\/a> [PDF], YouTube did know that they were collecting data from children.<\/p>\n<p>More surprising, even, is the fact that Google used YouTube\u2019s brand popularity among young kids as part of their marketing tactic, selling themselves to manufacturers and brands of child-centric products and services as \u201cthe new Saturday Morning Cartoons\u201d among others.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter\"><img decoding=\"async\" data-attachment-id=\"40374\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/privacy-2\/2019\/09\/youtube-170m-settlement-over-coppa-infraction\/attachment\/what_google_said_about_youtube\/\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/what_google_said_about_youtube.png\" data-orig-size=\"1200,600\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"what_google_said_about_youtube\" data-image-description=\"\" data-medium-file=\"https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/what_google_said_about_youtube-300x150.png\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/what_google_said_about_youtube-600x300.png\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/what_google_said_about_youtube-600x300.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-40374\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/what_google_said_about_youtube-600x300.png 600w, https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/what_google_said_about_youtube-300x150.png 300w, https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/what_google_said_about_youtube.png 1200w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><figcaption>How Google sells YouTube to third-parties offering goods and services to children. (Courtesy: The FTC)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>Despite this knowledge, YouTube never attempted to notify parents about their data collection process, nor did they ask parents for consent in the data collection. In COPPA\u2019s eyes, these are enormous red flags.<\/p>\n<h3>Good news: positive change is at hand<\/h3>\n<p>The settlement agreed upon between the FTC and Google\/YouTube includes a monetary relief\u2014the $170 million payout in this case\u2014and three injunctive reliefs, which is defined as an act or prohibition the companies must complete as ordered by the court. As per the press release, the injunctions are as follows:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Google and YouTube must &#8220;develop, implement, and maintain a system that permits channel owners to identify their child-directed content on the YouTube platform so that YouTube can ensure it is complying with COPPA.&#8221;<\/li>\n<li>Google and YouTube must &#8220;notify channel owners that their child-directed content may be subject to the COPPA Rule\u2019s obligations and provide annual training about complying with COPPA for employees who deal with YouTube channel owners.&#8221;<\/li>\n<li>Google and YouTube are prohibited from violating the COPPA Rule,  and the injunction &#8220;requires them to provide notice about their data collection practices and obtain verifiable parental consent before collecting personal information from children.&#8221; <\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter\"><img decoding=\"async\" data-attachment-id=\"40375\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/privacy-2\/2019\/09\/youtube-170m-settlement-over-coppa-infraction\/attachment\/youtube-socmed-1200x600-google-colors-082619-4_for_blog\/\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/youtube-socmed-1200x600-google-colors-082619-4_for_blog.png\" data-orig-size=\"1200,600\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"youtube-socmed-1200&#215;600-google-colors-082619-4_for_blog\" data-image-description=\"\" data-medium-file=\"https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/youtube-socmed-1200x600-google-colors-082619-4_for_blog-300x150.png\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/youtube-socmed-1200x600-google-colors-082619-4_for_blog-600x300.png\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/youtube-socmed-1200x600-google-colors-082619-4_for_blog-600x300.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-40375\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/youtube-socmed-1200x600-google-colors-082619-4_for_blog-600x300.png 600w, https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/youtube-socmed-1200x600-google-colors-082619-4_for_blog-300x150.png 300w, https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/youtube-socmed-1200x600-google-colors-082619-4_for_blog.png 1200w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><figcaption>A birds-eye view of what Google and YouTube should be doing in the months to come (Courtesy: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.consumer.ftc.gov\/blog\/2019\/09\/youtube-pays-big-tracking-kids\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\" (opens in a new tab)\">The FTC<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>As content creators are also culpable in letting the platform know about the kind of content they\u2019re producing and posting, the FTC has noted that failure to inform YouTube that their content is aimed at children could be subject to removal from YouTube and other civil penalties.<\/p>\n<p>Susan Wojcicki, CEO of YouTube, <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\" (opens in a new tab)\" href=\"https:\/\/youtube.googleblog.com\/2019\/09\/an-update-on-kids.html\" target=\"_blank\">took to its official blog<\/a> to personally update readers by expanding on these changes and reminding users that the company has been actively making changes within the video platform from Q4 2017. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe\u2019ve been significantly investing in the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/youtube.googleblog.com\/2019\/06\/an-update-on-our-efforts-to-protect.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\" (opens in a new tab)\">policies<\/a>,\u00a0<a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/youtube.googleblog.com\/2018\/04\/introducing-new-choices-for-parents-to.html\" target=\"_blank\">products<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0<a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/youtube.googleblog.com\/2017\/11\/5-ways-were-toughening-our-approach-to.html\" target=\"_blank\">practices<\/a> to help us do this,\u201d wrote Wojcicki. \u201cFrom its earliest days, YouTube has been a site for people over 13, but with a boom in family content and the rise of shared devices, the likelihood of children watching without supervision has increased. We\u2019ve been taking a hard look at areas where we can do more to address this\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Here is a list of expanded changes that YouTube will undergo in the coming months:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>In four months, data from anyone viewing content directed at children will be treated as coming from a child regardless of the viewer\u2019s actual age.<\/li>\n<li>Personalized ads will no longer be served within child-directed content. (Note that this doesn\u2019t mean that no ads will be shown.)<\/li>\n<li>Some YouTube features, like comments and notifications, will be unavailable on such content.<\/li>\n<li>YouTube will be using machine learning to find child-directed content.<\/li>\n<li>YouTube will further promote their YouTube Kids app to parents by running a campaign on YouTube itself and creating a desktop version of the app.<\/li>\n<li>YouTube will be providing support to family and kid content creators during the transition phase.<\/li>\n<li>YouTube is launching a $100 million fund for creators to make content that are both original and thoughtful. This fund is dispersed over the next three years.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>General dissatisfaction with results<\/h3>\n<p>While some may see this as a historic win for the FTC and the New York Attorney General, others view it as another exercise in avoiding due punishment for another big company breaking the law. <\/p>\n<p>Case in point: Commissioner Rohit Chopra, one of the two commissioners who voted against the settlement, <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\" (opens in a new tab)\" href=\"https:\/\/www.ftc.gov\/system\/files\/documents\/public_statements\/1542957\/chopra_google_youtube_dissent.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">pointed out in his statement<\/a> [PDF] the same mistakes the Commission made in a similar Facebook case: \u201c[There is] no individual accountability, insufficient remedies to address the company\u2019s financial incentives, and a fine that still allows the company to profit from its lawbreaking.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Chopra also noted inconsistencies with the way the FTC handles cases of small companies versus large firms. Ergo, the former is penalized excessively while the latter gets off easy. With this point, James P. Steyer, founder and CEO of Common Sense Media, agrees.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe settlement is nothing more than a slap on the wrist for a company as large as Google, and does not enforce meaningful change to truly protect children\u2019s data and privacy,\u201d Steyer said in an official statement. <\/p>\n<p>However, he also recognized that YouTube&#8217;s stated reforms are moving the dialogue forward. \u201cYouTube\u2019s commitment to enacting specific reforms on the platform is also a step in the right direction, but they must now put resources behind their statement. Kids and families must be a top priority in both Washington, DC, and in Silicon Valley.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter, the other dissenting party, <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\" (opens in a new tab)\" href=\"https:\/\/www.ftc.gov\/system\/files\/documents\/public_statements\/1542971\/slaughter_google_youtube_statement.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">raised in her own statement<\/a> [PDF] that the injunctions are incomplete, for they lack the orders and\/or mechanisms\u2014a \u201ctechnological backstop\u201d\u2014that ensure content creators are telling the truth in properly designating channels of child-directed content.<\/p>\n<p>Slaughter isn\u2019t the only one to mention what&#8217;s lacking in the settlement. Speaking to Angelique Carson, editor for the International Association of Privacy (IAPP) in <em>The Privacy Advisory Podcast<\/em>, Linnette Attai, president of global compliance firm <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\" (opens in a new tab)\" href=\"https:\/\/playwell-llc.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">PlayWell<\/a> and COPPA expert, expressed her concerns. <\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We\u2019re not seeing the rigorous third-party auditing that we\u2019ve seen, traditionally, in COPPA settlements. We\u2019re not seeing requirements to delete data, which is something that you will see in very early COPPA settlements but seems to have fallen off as an option for the FTC in recent years,&#8221; she said. &#8220;It\u2019s one thing to say, &#8216;You cannot use this data.&#8217; It\u2019s quite another to say, &#8216;You have to delete it,&#8217; which ensures that you cannot accidentally use it.&#8221;<\/p>\n<h3>V for vigilance<\/h3>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/101\/2018\/11\/dna-testing-kit-companies-really-data\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\"Every person has data (opens in a new tab)\">Every person has data<\/a>, and in this day and age, it&#8217;s passed around regularly, oftentimes nonchalantly, to those who may or may not appreciate its value. If users are unfazed about big and small companies crossing lines to monetize personal data, perhaps a stark reminder that cybercriminals are after your PII, too, will make you seriously consider how you approach your data privacy.<\/p>\n<p>Children\u2019s data is being targeted by threat actors, too. In fact, when it comes to fraud, cybercriminals prefer data belonging to kids over adults. This is why parents and carers must be extra vigilant in keeping their data\u2014and the data of their little ones\u2014secure. <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\" (opens in a new tab)\" href=\"https:\/\/www.consumer.ftc.gov\/articles\/pdf-0001-netcetera_0.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Talking to your kids about what it&#8217;s like online<\/a> [PDF], knowing the <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\" (opens in a new tab)\" href=\"https:\/\/www.consumer.ftc.gov\/articles\/0031-protecting-your-childs-privacy-online\" target=\"_blank\">ways you can protect your child\u2019s privacy<\/a>, and <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\" (opens in a new tab)\" href=\"http:\/\/www.ftc.gov\/complaint\" target=\"_blank\">reporting companies to the FTC<\/a> for potential COPPA rights violations are three big steps you can take to not only improve your child\u2019s privacy posture but their security posture as well.<\/p>\n<p>Stay safe, everyone! Especially for your kids. <\/p>\n<p>The post <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/privacy-2\/2019\/09\/youtube-170m-settlement-over-coppa-infraction\/\">YouTube ordered to cough up $170M settlement over COPPA infraction<\/a> appeared first on <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\">Malwarebytes Labs<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/privacy-2\/2019\/09\/youtube-170m-settlement-over-coppa-infraction\/\" target=\"bwo\" >https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/feed\/<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Credit to Author: Jovi Umawing| Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 20:15:22 +0000<\/strong><\/p>\n<table cellpadding='10'>\n<tr>\n<td valign='top' align='center'><a href='https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/privacy-2\/2019\/09\/youtube-170m-settlement-over-coppa-infraction\/' title='YouTube ordered to cough up $170M settlement over COPPA infraction'><img src='https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/shutterstock_442062754.jpg' border='0'  width='300px'  \/><\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td valign='top' align='left'>Last week, the FTC announced its settlement with Google over YouTube\u2019s COPPA violations, including requirements for better protecting children&#8217;s data. But is it enough?<\/p>\n<p>Categories: <\/p>\n<ul class=\"post-categories\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/category\/privacy-2\/\" rel=\"category tag\">Privacy<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<table width='100%'>\n<tr>\n<td align=right>\n<p><b>(<a href='https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/privacy-2\/2019\/09\/youtube-170m-settlement-over-coppa-infraction\/' title='YouTube ordered to cough up $170M settlement over COPPA infraction'>Read more&#8230;<\/a>)<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<p>The post <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/privacy-2\/2019\/09\/youtube-170m-settlement-over-coppa-infraction\/\">YouTube ordered to cough up $170M settlement over COPPA infraction<\/a> appeared first on <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\">Malwarebytes Labs<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"colormag_page_container_layout":"default_layout","colormag_page_sidebar_layout":"default_layout","footnotes":""},"categories":[10488,10378],"tags":[5897],"class_list":["post-16307","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-malwarebytes","category-security","tag-privacy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16307","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16307"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16307\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16307"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16307"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16307"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}