![](\"https:\/\/media.wired.com\/photos\/5db339546183ed000825209c\/master\/pass\/Security_tiktok_991873508.jpg\"\/)
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Credit to Author: Louise Matsakis| Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 22:31:41 +0000<\/strong><\/p>\n Three senators have called for an investigation into the social media app, which is owned by the Chinese tech giant ByteDance.<\/p>\n TikTok, the app that revolves around sharing short video clips, is in a unique<\/a> position. It\u2019s arguably the first international social media platform to have built a massive audience in the United States, where it\u2019s been downloaded more than 110 million times since its founding in 2017. TikTok has offices in California near competitors like Snapchat, Instagram, and YouTube, but it\u2019s owned by ByteDance<\/a>, a Chinese tech giant. As tensions<\/a> between the US and China continue to escalate<\/a>, that fact has become a headache for TikTok. Now the company is taking steps to distance itself publicly from its counterparts in Beijing.<\/p>\n This week, Senators Chuck Schumer (D-New York) and Tom Cotton (R-Arkansas) sent a letter<\/a> to US intelligence officials asking them to investigate whether TikTok poses \u201cnational security risks.\u201d In their letter, sent to Joseph Maguire, the acting director of national intelligence, the senators expressed concern about the data TikTok collects on US users and whether that information could potentially be shared with the Chinese Communist Party. They also questioned whether Tiktok censors content on its platform and said the app is a \u201cpotential counterintelligence threat we cannot ignore.\u201d<\/p>\n It wasn\u2019t the first time this month that lawmakers have questioned the security and content moderation practices of TikTok. Two weeks ago, Senator Marco Rubio (R-Florida) called<\/a> for the Committee on Foreign Investment to investigate ByteDance\u2019s 2017 acquisition of Musical.ly<\/a>, a lip-syncing app popular in the US that was later merged with TikTok. On Twitter, Rubio said<\/a> he was concerned TikTok is \u201ccensoring content in line with #China\u2019s communist government directives.\u201d<\/p>\n TikTok responded to the questions raised by all three senators in an unsigned blog post<\/a> published Thursday. The company asserts data on US users is stored in the United States, and that it isn\u2019t subject to Chinese law. It also said that it doesn\u2019t remove content \u201cbased on sensitivities to China.\u201d \u201cWe have never been asked by the Chinese government to remove any content and we would not do so if asked. Period,\u201d the post reads. \u201cOur US moderation team, which is led out of California, reviews content for adherence to our US policies\u2014just like other US companies in our space.\u201d<\/p>\n In its statement, TikTok also said it \u201cdoesn\u2019t operate in China,\u201d and doesn\u2019t intend to do so in the future. But it doesn\u2019t need to. The company didn\u2019t mention that ByteDance already owns the extremely popular Chinese version<\/a> of TikTok, called Douyin.<\/p>\n TikTok now appears sensitive about ensuring the two apps aren\u2019t conflated with one another. On Thursday night, a TikTok spokesperson emailed this reporter about a story<\/a> WIRED published in July about China\u2019s social credit system. The story had one line about the app partnering with local officials in a Chinese city, and the spokesperson requested that the original reference to TikTok be changed to Douyin. (The story has been updated accordingly.) But the timing of the message, and how much distance the company seemed to want from its counterpart, seemed striking. \u201cThey're separate apps, markets, users, content, teams, policies, etc.,\u201d the TikTok representative wrote.<\/p>\n Is there something about TikTok you think we should know? Contact the author at louise_matsakis@wired.com<\/a> or via Signal at 347-966-3806. WIRED protects the confidentiality of its sources, but if you wish to conceal your identity, here are the instructions for using SecureDrop<\/a>. You can also mail us materials at 520 Third Street, Suite 350, San Francisco, CA 94107.<\/p>\n Despite TikTok\u2019s efforts, the company\u2019s ties to China will almost certainly continue to be viewed with suspicion, not only by regulators but also by users. After *The Washington Post<\/a>* reported about the lack of content on TikTok concerning the ongoing pro-democracy protests<\/a> in Hong Kong, some users began experimenting to see whether their videos about the demonstrations would be removed. Buzzfeed News<\/a>, whose reporters also uploaded footage themselves, found that the clips weren\u2019t censored.<\/p>\n Concerns about censorship seem to arise whenever a tech company from China is involved. Reddit users performed similar experiments<\/a> after news broke earlier this year that Tencent would invest in the platform. Tencent also has a stake in Activision Blizzard, which has come under fire<\/a> for punishing an esports player who spoke out in support of the Hong Kong protests.<\/p>\n Some of this distrust in TikTok may also stem from how little is known about its content moderation policies and practices. TikTok\u2019s rules are relatively short<\/a> and don\u2019t go into too much detail. Compare that to Facebook, whose Community Standards<\/a> were developed over more than a decade and now read almost like a full governmental constitution. Like many platforms, TikTok also hasn\u2019t released much information about how the company\u2019s staff are told to interpret its policies. According to guidelines recently obtained by The Guardian<\/a><\/em>, TikTok previously instructed moderators to censor topics deemed sensitive by the Chinese government, as well as LGBT content in some markets. ByteDance has said the documents are outdated.<\/p>\n It\u2019s possible that TikTok itself<\/em> hasn\u2019t yet figured out how it plans to govern its platform, which has ballooned into an enormous global powerhouse only a few years after it launched. Like other social media companies, TikTok may initially have put more emphasis on growth than detecting problematic videos; the company reportedly spent nearly $1 billion<\/a> on advertising last year alone. But it\u2019s now facing many of the same controversies that other platforms have struggled with. This week, The Wall Street Journal<\/a><\/em> reported that Storyful, a social media intelligence company, had identified around two dozen accounts on TikTok connected to ISIS. And in February, TikTok was fined<\/a> by the Federal Trade Commission over allegations that Musical.ly illegally collected information on users under 13.<\/p>\n There are signs TikTok is looking to mature its approach to policing its app. Earlier this month, Vanessa Pappas, TikTok\u2019s US general manager, announced<\/a> the company was bringing in the law firm K&L Gates LLP to create a committee of outside experts to review and advise on its rules for \u201cchild safety, hate speech, misinformation, bullying, and other potential issues.\u201d The firm is also tasked with finding ways for TikTok to be more transparent about its policies and practices. And according to online job listings, TikTok is hiring more senior staff to work on moderation and security issues, including a trust and safety manager<\/a>, a privacy lawyer<\/a>, and an ethics and compliance manager<\/a>.<\/p>\n Even if TikTok opens up about its moderation practices, US concerns over its Chinese owner likely aren\u2019t going away, especially because of China\u2019s long track record of compelling tech companies to censor the internet within its borders. It\u2019s a fear Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, whose company has tried to compete with TikTok, appears more than happy to capitalize on. \u201cUntil recently, the internet in almost every country outside China has been defined by American platforms with strong free expression values,\u201d Zuckerberg said during a speech<\/a> at Georgetown University earlier this month. \u201cThere\u2019s no guarantee these values will win out.\u201d TikTok may be the biggest test yet.<\/p>\n Is there something about TikTok you think we should know? Contact the author at louise_matsakis@wired.com<\/a> or via Signal at 347-966-3806. WIRED protects the confidentiality of its sources, but if you wish to conceal your identity, here are the instructions for using SecureDrop<\/a>. You can also mail us materials at 520 Third Street, Suite 350, San Francisco, CA 94107.<\/em><\/p>\n