{"id":8719,"date":"2017-08-14T08:30:25","date_gmt":"2017-08-14T16:30:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/2017\/08\/14\/news-2492\/"},"modified":"2017-08-14T08:30:25","modified_gmt":"2017-08-14T16:30:25","slug":"news-2492","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/2017\/08\/14\/news-2492\/","title":{"rendered":"Another undocumented Surface Pro update \u2014 Dynamic Platform and Thermal Framework"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

Credit to Author: Woody Leonhard| Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 08:47:00 -0700<\/strong><\/p>\n

If you own a Surface Pro 2017, you may have seen three or more new, completely undocumented driver updates come down the Automatic Update chute over the weekend. They\u2019re called \u201cIntel driver update for Intel(r) Dynamic Platform and Thermal Framework Generic Participant,\u201d \u201cPower Participant,\u201d \u201cProcessor Participant\u201d and, for some, \u201cManager.\u201d The timing couldn\u2019t be worse, as Microsoft tries to counter the impression, championed by Consumer Reports<\/em><\/a>, that Surface machines can no longer be \u201cRecommended\u201d to laptop buyers.<\/p>\n

I first heard about the new drivers on Saturday afternoon \u2014 a very odd time to see a new driver. Apparently the three or four new drivers were sent to some Surface Pro machines that aren\u2019t actively blocking Windows Automatic Updates<\/a>. Surface firmware and driver updates are pushed out via Windows Automatic Update, so WU served as the infection vector again this time.<\/p>\n

I\u2019m told \u2014 but Microsoft hasn\u2019t yet confirmed \u2014 that these drivers are, indeed, legitimate, and that the documentation for them will be forthcoming<\/a>. At some point. We’ve heard that one before.<\/p>\n

An anonymous poster on AskWoody pointed me to a two-year-old AnadTech article<\/a> that describes drivers with the same names being released for Windows 8.1. The \u201cDynamic Platform and Thermal Framework\u201d drivers throttle (slow down) processors when they get too hot. Apparently Surface Pro 2017 machines are frying their brains, and these drivers can cool them off. At least, maybe they will. With no documentation, we’re just connecting some very obscure dots.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s all sadly reminiscent of the undocumented Surface drivers pushed out on Aug. 1. That undocumented camera driver, you may recall<\/a>, broke Windows Hello on Surface Pro 4. It took Microsoft three days to push out a new driver that restored Windows Hello. The second camera driver was documented<\/a>. Imagine that.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s astounding to me that these drivers slipped out, without notice or description, while Microsoft was readying a report that countered last week\u2019s widely publicized Consumer Reports<\/em> move to drop its \u201cRecommended\u201d imprimatur<\/a> from Surface machines.<\/p>\n

According to Paul Thurrott, who says he has seen an internal memo on the topic<\/a>, the Microsoft counterattack includes gems from Surface honcho Panos Panay such as these:<\/p>\n

\u201cIt\u2019s important for us to always learn more from our customers and how they view their ownership journey with our products. \u2026 Feedback like this [from Consumer Reports<\/em>] stings, but pushes us to obsess more about our customers.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cWe take quality seriously \u2026 conducting rigorous reliability testing during development to forecast failure and return rates, which are then continually viewed against [real world data] post-launch. We also regularly review other metrics to understand the experience we are providing to our customers and our findings show our products are in a much healthier place than noted by Consumer Reports.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201c[We] have put together a comprehensive set of data that reflects the strength of our quality and our customer sentiment, and will be working with partner organizations, including marketing, retail, and sales, to share that information broadly\u201d<\/p>\n

Michael Allison, in a tremendous response to Paul\u2019s leaked memo, said in mspoweruser<\/a>:<\/p>\n

If one were to take the Redmond line, the Surface line is immensely satisfying to customers, Intel was to blame for the Surface Pro 4 and Book issues, and that the subsequent products were better than the last one ( as if they were expected to get worse), etcetera. Microsoft will be working with marketing and other departments to share this information with consumers (So you can expect to see certain Microsoft news blogs touting the firm\u2019s numbers in the coming weeks), and mount a full-fledged defence of the Surface\u2026<\/p>\n

As much as I love Surface, the firm is doing the wrong thing here. Now that Surface sales are threatened by Consumer Reports pulling their recommendation, Microsoft is stepping in. When Microsoft\u2019s Surface Pro 3, 4, Book and Pro 2017 users were suffering from battery problems, reliability issues, hibernation issues, hot bagging, all this passion for their customers was nowhere to be seen.<\/p>\n

Now we\u2019re seeing it again. All this newfound passion for Surface customers didn\u2019t get through to the folks pushing out driver updates. It backfired two weeks ago. Let\u2019s see what happens this time.<\/p>\n

All the latest on the\u00a0AskWoody Lounge<\/a>.<\/i><\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.computerworld.com\/category\/security\/index.rss<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

Credit to Author: Woody Leonhard| Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 08:47:00 -0700<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n
\n

If you own a Surface Pro 2017, you may have seen three or more new, completely undocumented driver updates come down the Automatic Update chute over the weekend. They\u2019re called \u201cIntel driver update for Intel(r) Dynamic Platform and Thermal Framework Generic Participant,\u201d \u201cPower Participant,\u201d \u201cProcessor Participant\u201d and, for some, \u201cManager.\u201d The timing couldn\u2019t be worse, as Microsoft tries to counter the impression, championed by Consumer Reports<\/em><\/a>, that Surface machines can no longer be \u201cRecommended\u201d to laptop buyers.<\/p>\n

To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here<\/a><\/p>\n<\/section>\n<\/article>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"colormag_page_container_layout":"default_layout","colormag_page_sidebar_layout":"default_layout","footnotes":""},"categories":[11062,10643],"tags":[714,11150,10525],"class_list":["post-8719","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-computerworld","category-independent","tag-security","tag-tablets","tag-windows"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8719","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8719"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8719\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8719"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8719"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8719"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}