{"id":13039,"date":"2018-08-08T11:00:16","date_gmt":"2018-08-08T19:00:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/2018\/08\/08\/news-6806\/"},"modified":"2018-08-08T11:00:16","modified_gmt":"2018-08-08T19:00:16","slug":"news-6806","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/2018\/08\/08\/news-6806\/","title":{"rendered":"One year after Triton: Building ongoing, industry-wide cyber resilience"},"content":{"rendered":"

Credit to Author: Andrew Kling| Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2018 00:03:12 +0000<\/strong><\/p>\n

Cybersecurity Blog Series:\u00a0 Part 1<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

One year ago cybersecurity experts discovered the world\u2019s first known cyberattack on a safety instrumented system. Some called it Triton. Others named it TRISIS. Still others, Hatman. Yet regardless of the name, everyone agrees that it prompted a call to action for every industrial process and manufacturing enterprise in the era of the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT). What was once considered theoretical became a real threat to every industrial safety system, everywhere in the world, no matter who designed, engineered, built or operates it.<\/p>\n

Where do we go from here?<\/strong><\/p>\n

As a director of cybersecurity and architecture at Schneider Electric, I have been intimately involved in the Triton investigation, exploration of the attack\u2019s industry-wide implications, and steps to strengthen resiliency both in the here and now and for tomorrow. I am encouraged by the progress made over the last year, yet there is more work ahead. In fact, building cybersecurity resilience is an ongoing pursuit if we\u2019re to ensure the reliability and safety of assets in an increasingly digital world.<\/p>\n

As we reflect on the lessons of Triton and what we can do to combat future threats, Schneider Electric continues to encourage a three-pronged approach to creating a stronger global cyberculture:<\/p>\n