{"id":13406,"date":"2018-09-21T02:30:30","date_gmt":"2018-09-21T10:30:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/2018\/09\/21\/news-7173\/"},"modified":"2018-09-21T02:30:30","modified_gmt":"2018-09-21T10:30:30","slug":"news-7173","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/2018\/09\/21\/news-7173\/","title":{"rendered":"Back to the ol&#039; spam-fighting drawing board"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Credit to Author: Sharky| Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 03:00:00 -0700<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Pilot fish returns from an extended holiday weekend to find his inbox full of spam &#8212; and for once, dozens of the messages seem to be related.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I was curious, so I didn&#8217;t delete all 50 of them right away,&#8221; says fish. &#8220;The first one was obviously spam &#8212; a &#8216;Hi, do you remember me, can we talk?&#8217; message with a phishing link.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;But the first reply was from an autoresponder at a legal-services company: <i>Thank you for your email. You have reached the email inbox for&#8230; Please let us know if you have any questions.<\/i>&#8220;<\/p>\n<p>The next message is from another autoresponder, replying not to the spam but to the first autoresponder: <i>Thank you for contacting us. This is an automated response confirming the receipt of your ticket. Our team will get back to you as soon as possible.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>Then the human users arrive: &#8220;Hello. Can you please advise what this is regarding.&#8221; &#8220;Who and what is this?&#8221; &#8220;I have no idea who anyone involved in this email string is or why I am receiving this.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Next, the inevitable explanation: &#8220;My IT person said this type of email is a spam robot. Don&#8217;t click on the links. You may receive more of these odd emails. But disregard and ignore them.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Which was good advice,&#8221; fish says, &#8220;but too late for the next few human responses: &#8216;Looks like some type of phishing email chain and I do not know anyone involved either.&#8217; &#8216;Phishing probably.&#8217; &#8216;No idea what this connection is, but you guys all ROCK!&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;At that point, Stockholm Syndrome kicked in when a software company president replied, &#8216;It&#8217;s to bring us all together &#8212; perhaps we shouldn&#8217;t ignore?'&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Someone from a blood-donation center replies &#8220;I like your answer! You just never know!&#8221; &#8212; and because her reply-to line is the center&#8217;s email address for volunteers to give blood, that&#8217;s soon flooded with spam too.<\/p>\n<p>Next come jokes and social chatter, followed by some spam victims offering up their own products and services, from beachfront properties to custom-manufactured plastic products &#8212; followed by increasingly irritated demands from users to be removed from the thread, mixed with equally irritated &#8220;Stop Replying All!&#8221; messages.<\/p>\n<p>Eventually someone suggests that the victims &#8220;take the opportunity to learn how to create a rule or filter in your email program.&#8221; A few spam victims respond thanking him.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Finally a game designer pointed out that, according to the message headers, everything was being re-sent through a Google group because of an email address in the original spam,&#8221; says fish. &#8220;He gave specific instructions for unsubscribing from the group.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;An hour after that, there were no more messages. Presumably someone complained to Google and the list was shut down.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-size: 0.875em;\"><strong>Sharky gets lots of spam, but not nearly enough stories.<\/strong> <i>How about sending me <\/i>your<i> true tale of IT life this weekend at <a href=\"mailto:sharky@computerworld.com\" rel=\"nofollow\">sharky@computerworld.com<\/a>? You can also comment on today&#8217;s tale at <a href=\"https:\/\/plus.google.com\/u\/0\/communities\/113252326043973101081\" rel=\"nofollow\"><strong>Sharky&#8217;s Google+ community<\/strong><\/a>, and read thousands of great old tales in the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.computerworld.com\/search?query=+sharky&amp;s=d&amp;start=0\" title=\"Sharky's archives on easier-to-navigate pages\"><strong>Sharkives<\/strong><\/a>.<\/i><\/p>\n<p><em>Get Sharky&#8217;s outtakes from the IT Theater of the Absurd delivered directly to your Inbox. Subscribe now to the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.computerworld.com\/newsletters\/signup.html\" title=\"Daily Shark Newsletter subscription page\">Daily Shark Newsletter<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.computerworld.com\/article\/3307843\/security\/back-to-the-ol-spam-fighting-drawing-board.html#tk.rss_security\" target=\"bwo\" >http:\/\/www.computerworld.com\/category\/security\/index.rss<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Credit to Author: Sharky| Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 03:00:00 -0700<\/strong><\/p>\n<article>\n<section class=\"page\">\n<p>Pilot fish returns from an extended holiday weekend to find his inbox full of spam &#8212; and for once, dozens of the messages seem to be related.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I was curious, so I didn&#8217;t delete all 50 of them right away,&#8221; says fish. &#8220;The first one was obviously spam &#8212; a &#8216;Hi, do you remember me, can we talk?&#8217; message with a phishing link.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;But the first reply was from an autoresponder at a legal-services company: <i>Thank you for your email. You have reached the email inbox for&#8230; Please let us know if you have any questions.<\/i>&#8220;<\/p>\n<p>The next message is from another autoresponder, replying not to the spam but to the first autoresponder: <i>Thank you for contacting us. This is an automated response confirming the receipt of your ticket. Our team will get back to you as soon as possible.<\/i><\/p>\n<p class=\"jumpTag\"><a href=\"\/article\/3307843\/security\/back-to-the-ol-spam-fighting-drawing-board.html#jump\">To read this article in full, please click here<\/a><\/p>\n<\/section>\n<\/article>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"colormag_page_container_layout":"default_layout","colormag_page_sidebar_layout":"default_layout","footnotes":""},"categories":[11062,10643],"tags":[714],"class_list":["post-13406","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-computerworld","category-independent","tag-security"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13406","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13406"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13406\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13406"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13406"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13406"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}