{"id":18326,"date":"2022-02-21T08:10:16","date_gmt":"2022-02-21T16:10:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/2022\/02\/21\/news-12059\/"},"modified":"2022-02-21T08:10:16","modified_gmt":"2022-02-21T16:10:16","slug":"news-12059","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/2022\/02\/21\/news-12059\/","title":{"rendered":"Facebook sued for siphoning facial recognition data without consent"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Credit to Author: Jovi Umawing| Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:12:18 +0000<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Ken Paxton, the Attorney General of Texas, recently filed a lawsuit against Facebook&#8217;s parent company, Meta, for harvesting the facial recognition data of millions of Texan residents\u2014for a decade.<\/p>\n<p>Paxton filed the lawsuit on Monday in the state&#8217;s Harrison County District Court. The suit contains arguments that Facebook&#8217;s now-defunct photo-tagging feature illegally collected data about Texan people&#8217;s faces, including those who are non-Facebook users but were tagged by someone who is, without asking for consent. Facebook was able to collect such data via its face recognition technology.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed aligncenter is-type-video is-provider-vimeo wp-block-embed-vimeo wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<div class=\"embed-vimeo\" style=\"text-align: center;\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/player.vimeo.com\/video\/136019107\" width=\"100%\" height=\"420\" frameborder=\"0\" webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen style=\"\"><\/iframe><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div><figcaption><em>Six years ago, Yann LeCun, currently Chief AI Scientist at Meta, gave Facebook users an idea of how his team approached its work in artificial intelligence research and facial recognition.<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Facebook introduced <a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101216120120\/https:\/\/blog.facebook.com\/blog.php?post=467145887130\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">face recognition technology<\/a> in 2010 to make tagging friends and family on photos more manageable. The company <a href=\"https:\/\/about.fb.com\/news\/2017\/12\/managing-your-identity-on-facebook-with-face-recognition-technology\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">updated and implemented this technology<\/a> in December 2017 to assist users in managing their identity on the platform by helping them &#8220;find photos that you&#8217;re not tagged in and help you detect when others might be attempting to use your image as their profile picture.&#8221; Not only was the tool intended to protect users&#8217; identities on Facebook, it was also supposed to help visually impaired users to identify the people in the photos they encountered on Facebook.<\/p>\n<p>Three months ago, Jerome Presenti, the VP of artificial intelligence, <a href=\"https:\/\/about.fb.com\/news\/2021\/11\/update-on-use-of-face-recognition\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">announced<\/a> that Facebook would be shutting down its face recognition system as part of a company-wide move to limit its use in their products. This change, in turn, will affect blind and visually impaired services that identify names in photos. Facebook users who are wary that their faces might be in pictures or videos posted by other users\u2014especially those who create fake Facebook profiles and use stolen photos\u2014will no longer be notified. But the most significant effect of all is that the &#8220;facial recognition templates&#8221; of more than a third of Facebook&#8217;s users will be deleted, the company says.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>We believe facial recognition can help for products like these with privacy, transparency and control in place, so you decide if and how your face is used,&#8221; wrote Presenti, &#8220;There are many concerns about the place of facial recognition technology in society, and regulators are still in the process of providing a clear set of rules governing its use. Amid this ongoing uncertainty, we believe that limiting the use of facial recognition to a narrow set of use cases is appropriate.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>The lawsuit Paxton has filed alleges that Facebook, before shutting down its AI tool, had already amassed &#8220;biometric identifiers of Texans for a commercial purpose without their informed consent, disclosed those identities to others, and failed to destroy collected identifiers within a reasonable time, all in violation of the Texas Capture or Use of Biometric Identifier Act (CUBI). Paxton also alleges that the social media platform engaged in deceptive acts, breaking the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Consumer Protection Act (DTPA).<\/p>\n<p>Paxton doesn&#8217;t see Facebook&#8217;s face recognition technology as a means to protect its user&#8217;s identities. Instead, he sees it as a deceptive scheme against Texans. The system captured their immutable data as they innocently shared photos and videos with friends and family members on the platform. All the while, the company profited from the data and trained its AI while putting its users at risk.<\/p>\n<p>Meta may have pulled its face recognition tool from Facebook, but Meta has other platforms. And, according to the lawsuit, Facebook &#8220;made no such commitment with respect to any of the other platforms or operations under its corporate umbrella, such as Instagram, WhatsApp, Facebook Reality Labs, and its upcoming virtual reality metaverse.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.texastribune.org\/2022\/02\/14\/paxton-facebook-privacy-lawsuit\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">According to the Texas Tribune<\/a>, this lawsuit against Facebook is just the latest in a string of Paxton&#8217;s actions against big named companies. In January, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.texasattorneygeneral.gov\/news\/releases\/ag-paxton-sues-google-deceptively-tracking-users-location-without-consent\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">he sued Google<\/a> over &#8220;deceptively tracking users&#8217; location without consent&#8221; and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theverge.com\/2021\/3\/9\/22321327\/twitter-ken-paxton-texas-ag-lawsuit-content-moderation-probe\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">issued a probe on Twitter<\/a> for its content moderation practices. Earlier this month, his office <a href=\"https:\/\/www.texastribune.org\/2022\/02\/14\/paxton-facebook-privacy-lawsuit\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">joined a brief<\/a> to accuse Apple of violating antitrust laws (among others). And last week, he opened an investigation into GoFundMe for pulling the &#8220;Freedom Convoy,&#8221; a fundraiser campaign for Canadian truckers protesting against pandemic restrictions.<\/p>\n<p>The post <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/privacy-2\/2022\/02\/facebook-sued-for-siphoning-facial-recognition-data-without-consent\/\">Facebook sued for siphoning facial recognition data without consent<\/a> appeared first on <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\">Malwarebytes Labs<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/privacy-2\/2022\/02\/facebook-sued-for-siphoning-facial-recognition-data-without-consent\/\" target=\"bwo\" >https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/feed\/<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Credit to Author: Jovi Umawing| Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:12:18 +0000<\/strong><\/p>\n<table cellpadding='10'>\n<tr>\n<td valign='top' align='center'><a href='https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/privacy-2\/2022\/02\/facebook-sued-for-siphoning-facial-recognition-data-without-consent\/' title='Facebook sued for siphoning facial recognition data without consent'><img src='https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/GettyImages-88694269.jpg' border='0'  width='300px'  \/><\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td valign='top' align='left'>The suit alleges that Facebook&#8217;s now-defunct photo-tagging feature illegally collected data about Texans, including non-Facebook users.<\/p>\n<p>Categories: <a href=\"https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/category\/privacy-2\/\" rel=\"category tag\">Privacy<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Tags: <a href=\"https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/tag\/cubi\/\" rel=\"tag\">CUBI<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/tag\/dtpa\/\" rel=\"tag\">DTPA<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/tag\/face-recognition\/\" rel=\"tag\">face recognition<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/tag\/facebook\/\" rel=\"tag\">facebook<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/tag\/facial-recognition\/\" rel=\"tag\">facial recognition<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/tag\/jerome-presenti\/\" rel=\"tag\">Jerome Presenti<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/tag\/ken-paxton\/\" rel=\"tag\">Ken Paxton<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/tag\/meta\/\" rel=\"tag\">meta<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/tag\/state-of-texas\/\" rel=\"tag\">state of Texas<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/tag\/texas-capture-or-use-of-biometric-identifier-act\/\" rel=\"tag\">Texas Capture or Use of Biometric Identifier Act<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/tag\/texas-deceptive-trade-practices-consumer-protection-act\/\" rel=\"tag\">Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Consumer Protection Act<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/tag\/yann-lecun\/\" rel=\"tag\">Yann LeCun<\/a><\/p>\n<table width='100%'>\n<tr>\n<td align=right>\n<p><b>(<a href='https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/privacy-2\/2022\/02\/facebook-sued-for-siphoning-facial-recognition-data-without-consent\/' title='Facebook sued for siphoning facial recognition data without consent'>Read more&#8230;<\/a>)<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<p>The post <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\/privacy-2\/2022\/02\/facebook-sued-for-siphoning-facial-recognition-data-without-consent\/\">Facebook sued for siphoning facial recognition data without consent<\/a> appeared first on <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/blog.malwarebytes.com\">Malwarebytes Labs<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"colormag_page_container_layout":"default_layout","colormag_page_sidebar_layout":"default_layout","footnotes":""},"categories":[10488,10378],"tags":[25053,25054,25055,3589,14753,25056,25057,24884,5897,25058,25059,25060,25061],"class_list":["post-18326","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-malwarebytes","category-security","tag-cubi","tag-dtpa","tag-face-recognition","tag-facebook","tag-facial-recognition","tag-jerome-presenti","tag-ken-paxton","tag-meta","tag-privacy","tag-state-of-texas","tag-texas-capture-or-use-of-biometric-identifier-act","tag-texas-deceptive-trade-practices-consumer-protection-act","tag-yann-lecun"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18326","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18326"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18326\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18326"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18326"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18326"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}