![](\"https:\/\/media.wired.com\/photos\/62758a9b1ccd62686f071008\/master\/pass\/Apple-Mail-Blocking-Tracking-Security-GettyImages--1228823240.jpg\"\/)
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Credit to Author: Justin Pot| Date: Sat, 07 May 2022 11:00:00 +0000<\/strong><\/p>\n Justin Pot<\/a><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n To revist this article, visit My Profile, then View saved stories<\/a>.<\/p>\n To revist this article, visit My Profile, then View saved stories<\/a>.<\/p>\n Nothing makes you<\/span> more paranoid about privacy than working in a marketing department. Trust me on this. For example, did you know that marketers track every time you open an email newsletter\u2014and where you were when you did it?<\/p>\n Apple caused a small panic among marketers in September 2021 by effectively making this tracking impossible in the default Mail app on iPhone, iPad, and Mac. I, personally, switched to Apple Mail as soon as the feature was announced. You might feel the same way, but marketers feel as though they've lost a useful tool.<\/p>\n "If I start a conversation with somebody and they're not responding to me, I'm going to stop talking to them at some point," says Simon Poulton, vice president of digital intelligence at marketing agency Wpromote<\/a>. "But if someone is nodding along, I'm going to keep talking."<\/p>\n Tracking email opens, to Poulton, is a way for marketers to see who is, and isn't, listening\u2014and adjust their strategy accordingly.<\/p>\n Privacy advocates feel differently. Bill Budington, senior staff technologist at the Electronic Frontier Foundation<\/a>, says tracking is bad for privacy, and he's pleased that \u201cApple Mail now provides tools to take your privacy back.\u201d<\/p>\n Let\u2019s talk more about what, exactly, this feature does\u2014and what it means for you.<\/p>\n If you're really freaking old\u201436, say\u2014you might recall some \u201990s email clients couldn't open certain emails with formatting. You'd instead be prompted to open the email in your web browser. There's a reason for this.<\/p>\n Email dates back to the \u201970s, when computers couldn't display much in the way of graphics. Because of this, email protocols are more or less designed for simple text messages with attachments\u2014which works until you want to add things like colors and images. By the \u201990s, a workaround showed up: adding HTML code to an email message that points to images hosted on servers.<\/p>\n I bring this history up only because it's what makes modern email tracking possible. Most email newsletters you get include an invisible \u201cimage,\u201d typically a single white pixel, with a unique file name. The server keeps track of every time this \u201cimage\u201d is opened and by which IP address. This quirk of internet history means that marketers can track exactly when you open an email and your IP address, which can be used to roughly work out your location.<\/p>\n So, how does Apple Mail stop this? By caching. Apple Mail downloads all images for all emails before you open them. Practically speaking, that means every message downloaded to Apple Mail is marked \u201cread,\u201d regardless of whether you open it. Apples also routes the download through two different proxies, meaning your precise location also can't be tracked.<\/p>\n So did this catch marketers off guard? Kind of.<\/p>\n \u201cThe Apple Mail thing specifically kind of came out of left field,\u201d Poulton tells me, \u201cbut the whole idea of the de-identification of users is something we've been planning on for a while. This is a multipronged attack from Apple.\u201d<\/p>\n Poulton points to a few other Apple features, including iCloud's Hide My Email<\/a> and Intelligent Tracking Prevention in Safari and iOS<\/a>, as other prongs in this attack. These features make it harder, for example, for marketing departments to use your shopping behavior on their website to show a targeted ad on Facebook.<\/p>\n \u201cApple's goal is to prevent any kind of digital identity stitching across environments,\u201d says Poulton, which is exactly what privacy advocates have been pushing for\u2014the ability for users and individuals to determine whether marketing firms can connect their activities on one platform to their identities on others. I should note, Poulton argues that consumers are worse<\/em> off<\/em> without this tracking, which he says makes for more relevant ads.<\/p>\n \u201cThe internet has always been on a track toward personalization,\u201d he says. \u201cIf it can just predict my needs and desires before I get there, that's better. I don't want to have to go out and make decisions. Sometimes I don't even know what I'm searching for.\u201d<\/p>\n Myself? I switched to Mac Mail entirely because of this feature, and not only because I value my privacy. Less relevant ads mean I'm less likely to buy crap I don't need, which means I have more money to save or donate to organizations that need it. It also makes the world feel just a little less dystopian, which I personally like. But that's possibly just a matter of preference.<\/p>\n