{"id":7403,"date":"2017-04-20T14:30:06","date_gmt":"2017-04-20T22:30:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/2017\/04\/20\/news-1194\/"},"modified":"2017-04-20T14:30:06","modified_gmt":"2017-04-20T22:30:06","slug":"news-1194","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/2017\/04\/20\/news-1194\/","title":{"rendered":"Hackers use old Stuxnet-related bug to carry out attacks"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/zapt1.staticworld.net\/images\/article\/2017\/01\/dsc05476-100704596-large.3x2.jpg\"\/><\/p>\n<p><strong>Credit to Author: Michael Kan| Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 13:57:00 -0700<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Users that run unpatched software beware. Hackers have been relying on an old software bug tied to the Stuxnet worm to carry out their attacks.<\/p>\n<p>Microsoft may have initially patched the flaw in 2010, but it&#8217;s nevertheless become the most widespread software exploit, according to security firm Kaspersky Lab.<\/p>\n<p>On Thursday, Kaspersky <a href=\"https:\/\/securelist.com\/analysis\/publications\/78125\/exploits-how-great-is-the-threat\/\">posted<\/a> research examining the use of exploits, or malicious programs designed to take advantage of certain software flaws. Once an exploit goes to work, it can typically pave the way for other malicious programs to install onto a computer.<\/p>\n<p>A vulnerability known as <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cve.mitre.org\/cgi-bin\/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2010-2568\">CVE-2010-2568<\/a>\u00a0and used by the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pcworld.com\/article\/205827\/was_stuxnet_built_to_attack_irans_nuclear_program.html\">Stuxnet<\/a> computer worm\u00a0can be weaponized to remotely execute code over a Windows computer without the user&#8217;s knowledge. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>In 2015, and in 2016, it was used to target about a quarter of Kaspersky users who had encountered an exploit, the security firm said. \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Fortunately, the vulnerability only affects older systems such as Windows XP, Windows Server 2008, and Windows 7. But that hasn&#8217;t stopped hackers from finding susceptible systems.<\/p>\n<p>The hackers behind these exploits have been using them in malware that can &#8220;self-replicate&#8221; over a network and remain on affected computers, Kaspersky said.<\/p>\n<p>The lesson: Hackers can still succeed\u00a0when computers are still running out-of-date software. The <a href=\"https:\/\/go.kaspersky.com\/rs\/802-IJN-240\/images\/Report_Exploits_in_2016_eng.pdf\">research<\/a> from Kaspersky highlights other well-known vulnerabilities in Microsoft Office, Android, and Java that hackers are still targeting, despite past software fixes. \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The life of an exploit doesn\u2019t end with the release of a security patch,&#8221; the security firm said.<\/p>\n<p>The warning isn\u2019t new. But lately, the security community has been stressing the need for users and businesses to keep their software up to date. Last week, a mysterious group <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pcworld.com\/article\/3190121\/security\/new-nsa-leak-may-expose-its-bank-spying-windows-exploits.html\">released<\/a> a cache of suspected U.S. government spying tools that anyone can now use to hack older Windows systems. \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Microsoft has already issued patches fixing the software flaws the tools target. However, an\u00a0older\u00a0operating system like <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pcworld.com\/article\/3190204\/security\/leaked-nsa-exploits-plant-a-bulls-eye-on-windows-server.html\">Windows Server<\/a> 2003 will remain vulnerable indefinitely to some of the risks\u00a0because Microsoft no longer supports the software. \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Any remaining Windows Server 2003 machines should be upgraded immediately,&#8221; security provider Rendition InfoSec said in a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.renditioninfosec.com\/2017\/04\/shadow_brokers_windows_exploits\/\">blog post<\/a>.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.computerworld.com\/article\/3191259\/security\/hackers-use-old-stuxnet-related-bug-to-carry-out-attacks.html#tk.rss_security\" target=\"bwo\" >http:\/\/www.computerworld.com\/category\/security\/index.rss<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/zapt1.staticworld.net\/images\/article\/2017\/01\/dsc05476-100704596-large.3x2.jpg\"\/><\/p>\n<p><strong>Credit to Author: Michael Kan| Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 13:57:00 -0700<\/strong><\/p>\n<article>\n<section class=\"page\">\n<p>Users that run unpatched software beware. Hackers have been relying on an old software bug tied to the Stuxnet worm to carry out their attacks.<\/p>\n<p>Microsoft may have initially patched the flaw in 2010, but it&#8217;s nevertheless become the most widespread software exploit, according to security firm Kaspersky Lab.<\/p>\n<p>On Thursday, Kaspersky <a href=\"https:\/\/securelist.com\/analysis\/publications\/78125\/exploits-how-great-is-the-threat\/\">posted<\/a> research examining the use of exploits, or malicious programs designed to take advantage of certain software flaws. Once an exploit goes to work, it can typically pave the way for other malicious programs to install onto a computer.<\/p>\n<p class=\"jumpTag\"><a href=\"\/article\/3191259\/security\/hackers-use-old-stuxnet-related-bug-to-carry-out-attacks.html#jump\">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here<\/a><\/p>\n<\/section>\n<\/article>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"colormag_page_container_layout":"default_layout","colormag_page_sidebar_layout":"default_layout","footnotes":""},"categories":[11062,10643],"tags":[11073,714],"class_list":["post-7403","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-computerworld","category-independent","tag-malware-vulnerabilities","tag-security"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7403","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7403"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7403\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7403"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7403"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.palada.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7403"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}