![](\"https:\/\/media.wired.com\/photos\/59937e891e52c53514e20731\/master\/pass\/TrumpConferenceHP-831983932.jpg\"\/)
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Credit to Author: Ashley Feinberg| Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 01:47:17 +0000<\/strong><\/p>\n The schedule for <\/span>Donald Trump's first full day back in New York since the start of his presidency entailed walking into the Trump Tower lobby, talking about infrastructure for a few minutes, and immediately re-boarding his golden elevator without taking any questions. Much to Chief of Staff John Kelly's apparent chagrin<\/a>, that did not happen.<\/p>\n Instead, Trump opted to take a few questions after his prepared remarks. The assembled reporters naturally had more questions about last weekend's white nationalist rally in Charlottesville<\/a> than they did infrastructure bureaucracy. The result? A deluge of remarks<\/a> suggesting that both sides (Nazis, and those who protested their assembly) shared the blame for Saturday's violence equally. Trump asserted that he did not initially denounce white supremacists by name until Monday because he didn't have all available facts until then, and pondered if pulling down a statue of Confederate general Robert E. Lee would lead to the targeting of George Washington and Thomas Jefferson next.<\/p>\n Creating an equivalence between a group with swastikas, lit torches, and semi-automatic weapons struck many observers as patently absurd, especially given that one of those alleged white supremacists was charged with plowing into a crowd of protesters with his car, killing one and injuring 19 others. But a closer examination of Trump's talking points shows that nearly every one has a direct link back to either someone the president follows on Twitter, or a Fox News segment since Saturday.<\/p>\n Trump notoriously<\/a> picks up<\/a> proclamations from either Twitter or his cable news habit, of which Fox News plays<\/a> a significant role. That Trump's divisive comments Tuesday appear to stem from sources with a national audience suggests that they shouldn\u2019t have come as a complete surprise\u2014and that the white supremacists marching through Virginia this past weekend have far more apologists than one might have assumed.<\/p>\n To help you get a glimpse of how Trump's Nazi-friendly statements formed, here are his more salient points, traced to the likely source.<\/p>\n Donald Trump said:<\/strong> "The statement I made on Saturday, the first statement, was a fine statement, but you don't make statements that direct unless you know the facts.<\/strong> And it takes a little while to get the facts<\/strong>. You still don't know the facts. And it is a very, very important process to me. It is a very important statement. So I don't want to go quickly and just make a statement for the sake of making a political statement. I want to know the facts<\/strong>."<\/p>\n Trump's Twitter timeline said:<\/strong> "It has become 'shoot first..then investigate' \u2013 rather than, 'what are the facts?<\/strong> Can we figure out a solution?" – Greta Van Susteren, Aug 13, 8:28 am<\/a><\/p>\n "Bottom line: need a complete investigation into all the facts<\/strong> and circumstances surrounding it" – Greta Van Susteran, Aug 13, 12:25 pm<\/a><\/p>\n Fox News said:<\/strong> Monday, on Fox News show The Five<\/em>, co-host Jesse Watters let the president off the hook for his tepid first response:<\/p>\n JESSE WATTERS: "I'm not in the President's head, thank God. Perhaps the President was thinking, you know what? We don't have all the facts<\/strong> like Dana said. Let's just take a big picture approach. Because both sides are rumbling. I don't know who the driver was before I make a statement<\/strong>. And I don't think he was going to let the left wing violence off the hook. So, who knows what is going to happen.<\/p>\n Donald Trump said:<\/strong> "Many of those people were there to protest the taking down of the statue of Robert E. Lee. So this week, it\u2019s Robert E. Lee, I noticed that Stonewall Jackson\u2019s coming down. I wonder, is it George Washington next week? And is it Thomas Jefferson the week after.<\/strong> You know, you really do have to ask yourself, where does it stop?<\/strong>"<\/p>\n Fox News said:<\/strong> As BuzzFeed pointed out,<\/a> Fox's Martha MacCallum spent Monday evening discussing this very subject with Trump confidant Newt Gingrich:<\/p>\n NEWT GINGRICH: Where are you going to stop it?<\/strong> What if you weren't sensitive enough to the Holocaust, we should take down all the statues of Franklin Delano Roosevelt? You could make an argument for that.<\/p>\n MARTHA MACCALLUM: You could make an argument for Thomas Jefferson or George Washington<\/strong>. Are you going to change the name of the Washington Monument?<\/p>\n Donald Trump said:<\/strong> "…But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists, okay? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly.<\/strong> Now, in the other group also, you had some fine people, but you also had troublemakers and you see them come with the black outfits and with the helmets and with the baseball bats<\/strong> \u2013 you had a lot of bad people in the other group too."<\/p>\n Trump's Twitter timeline said:<\/strong> "Media so powerful that neither Dem nor GOP will condemn left-wing violence<\/strong> from Antifa, who are immune from arrest or criticism." – Ann Coulter, August 14, 12:47 pm<\/a>.<\/p>\n "Fear of 'violent left' preceded events in Charlottesville<\/strong>… http:\/\/wapo.st\/2wHkoLJ " – Drudge Report, August 13, 7:00 pm<\/a>.<\/p>\n Fox News said:<\/strong><\/p>\n Yesterday evening, Fox News correspondent Doug McKelway assigned equal blame to both sides, also citing baseball bats and helmets:<\/p>\n DOUG MCKELWAY: We saw people coming out of the park who had head wounds, who were bleeding from the head. We saw people walking into that park with bats, with sticks.<\/strong> You saw what they were wearing, helmets, body armor.<\/strong> They had come \u2013 and this pertains to both sides \u2013 they had come to do damage."<\/p>\n Donald Trump said:<\/strong> "…And I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally \u2013 but you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists, okay<\/strong>?<\/p>\n