5 great talks you may have missed at RSA 2018
Credit to Author: Brendan Mangus| Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 10:41:15 +0000
See a few highlights from the RSA Conference 2018 in San Francisco.
Read MoreRSS Reader for Computer Security Articles
Credit to Author: Brendan Mangus| Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 10:41:15 +0000
See a few highlights from the RSA Conference 2018 in San Francisco.
Read MoreCredit to Author: Jovi Umawing| Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 15:00:00 +0000
![]() | |
| Sophisticated social engineering. Fileless malware. Specialized Trojans. These are the threats that keep the financial sector on its toes—making way for a new mode of authentication called behavioral biometrics. And its primary concern is not what your credentials are but how you enter them. Categories: Tags: artificial intelligencebehaviometricsbehavior-based authenticationbehavioral biometricsfinancialmachine learning |
The post Securing financial data of the future: behavioral biometrics explained appeared first on Malwarebytes Labs.
Read More
Credit to Author: Woody Leonhard| Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 07:20:00 -0700
Late last night — on a Monday, mind you — Microsoft released its second big cumulative update for Win10 version 1709. This completes the triumvirate of second cumulative updates, since last week, on the third Tuesday of the month, Microsoft released second cumulative updates for Win10 1703 and 1607.
There’s a pattern emerging. Microsoft is now showering Win10 customers with two (sometimes more) cumulative updates a month, and they’re big. The first cumulative update contains security patches and a big hodgepodge of additional bug fixes. The first one is (usually) released on the second Tuesday of the month. The second cumulative update arrives, uh, whenever, and it contains massive amounts of bug fixes in addition to those in the first — including, if we’re lucky, fixes for the bugs introduced by the month’s first cumulative update.

Credit to Author: Tiziana Carboni| Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 13:33:47 +0000
Gli IT manager non riescono ad identificare il 45% del traffico di rete della propria azienda<img src=”http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sophos/dgdY/~4/6u2Xv7aYM0c” height=”1″ width=”1″ alt=””/>
Read More
Credit to Author: Tiziana Carboni| Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 05:09:46 +0000
Cinque suggerimenti che ti saranno di grande aiuto per mantenere te e le tue informazioni al sicuro<img src=”http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sophos/dgdY/~4/fl25kwDHOzg” height=”1″ width=”1″ alt=””/>
Read More
Credit to Author: Ken Mingis| Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 03:30:00 -0700
One of the many topics techies like to debate is whether Google’s Android or Apple’s iOS is more inherently secure. Sure, Apple has a closed system that makes it harder for iPhone users to get into trouble. But the frequent headlines about Android malware usually miss the point.
As Computerworld‘s JR Raphael explains, an Android user would really have to work at picking up malware. Android has multiple layers of defense; malware doesn’t install itself without user intervention; and the chances of actually coming across damaging malware is really, really small.

Credit to Author: JR Raphael| Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 03:00:00 -0700
Let’s get one thing out of the way right off the bat: If you’re looking for recommendations about Android security suites or other malware-scanning software, you’ve come to the wrong place.
Why? Because, like most people who closely study Android, I don’t recommend using those types of apps at all. Android malware isn’t the massive real-world threat it’s frequently made out to be, and Google Play Protect and other native Android features are more than enough to keep most devices safe.

Google's Android OS sometimes gets unfairly maligned as being weak on security. Computerworld blogger JR Raphael explains why that's a misconception and how users can keep their devices safe.