ComputerWorldIndependent

No, Windows XP didn't fuel WannaCry

Credit to Author: Gregg Keizer| Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 12:57:00 -0700

The global WannaCry attack that started 10 days ago touched just a handful of Windows XP PCs, a security expert said Monday, contradicting the narrative that the aged OS was largely responsible for the ransomware’s crippling impact.

“There were no real WannaCry infections of Windows XP,” said Costin Raiu, director of Kaspersky Lab’s global research and analysis team, in an interview Monday. “We’ve seen only a handful of cases, less than a dozen, and it looks like most of them were testers [self-infecting systems].”

Raiu’s claim countered an assertion made by virtually every media report and blog post published after “WannaCry” emerged June 12. Countless news stories blamed Windows XP, which Microsoft retired three years ago, for falling victim to the attack because the vulnerability that WannaCry exploited had not been patched in the obsolete OS.

To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here

Read More
ComputerWorldIndependent

IDG Contributor Network: Winning the war on ransomware

Credit to Author: Rob Cheng| Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 11:00:00 -0700

Back in the ‘70s, the United States suffered a severe oil shortage.

Lines at the gas station filled city blocks. Thieves siphoned gasoline not to save money but time. In response, the federal government created a measurement, miles per gallon. Since then, MPG has become a factor in many car purchase decisions. Today, fuel efficiency has improved threefold, and we have hybrid and electric cars.

We are facing another crisis that threatens our way of life — ransomware. Cybercriminals hold hostage individual, public sector and enterprise data with remarkable ease and frequency. Although paying ransoms may solve a short-term problem, it almost guarantees that attacks will continue creating a larger threat to our digital society.

To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here

Read More
SecuritySophos

GDPR’s Right to Explanation: the pros and the cons

Credit to Author: Bill Brenner| Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 13:46:54 +0000

Under the General Data Protection Regulation’s Right to Explanation a user can ask for an explanation about an algorithmic decision made about them – but with it comes positives and negatives.<img alt=”” border=”0″ src=”https://pixel.wp.com/b.gif?host=news.sophos.com&#038;blog=834173&#038;post=34450&#038;subd=sophos&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1″ width=”1″ height=”1″ /><img src=”http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sophos/dgdY/~4/sN8EgDhvG5Y” height=”1″ width=”1″ alt=””/>

Read More
FortinetSecurity

Byline: Artificial Intelligence: Cybersecurity Friend or Foe?

Credit to Author: Derek Manky| Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 07:41:32 -0700

​​​​​​​Security strategies need to undergo a radical evolution. Tomorrow’s security devices will need to see and interoperate with each other to recognize changes in the networked environment, anticipate new risks and automatically update and enforce policies. The devices must be able to monitor and share critical information and synchronize responses to detected threats.

Read More
ComputerWorldIndependent

Leak: Secret Facebook rules on what violence, self-harm and child abuse can be posted

Credit to Author: Darlene Storm| Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 06:18:00 -0700

Facebook allows users to livestream self-harm, post videos of violent deaths and photos of non-sexual child abuse, but comments which threaten to harm President Donald Trump are to be deleted, according to Facebook’s secret rule books for monitoring what its 2 billion users can post.

The Guardian got hold of leaked copies of over 100 internal Facebook manuals and documents that tell moderators how to handle content which includes violence, sex, hate speech, terrorism, nudity, self-harm, revenge porn and more controversial content – even cannibalism.

To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here

Read More

(Insider Story)

Read More